Wajikra 6:8 Kommentar: Rashi, Siftei Chakhamim & Chizkuni

וְהֵרִ֨ים מִמֶּ֜נּוּ בְּקֻמְצ֗וֹ מִסֹּ֤לֶת הַמִּנְחָה֙ וּמִשַּׁמְנָ֔הּ וְאֵת֙ כָּל־הַלְּבֹנָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֖ר עַל־הַמִּנְחָ֑ה וְהִקְטִ֣יר הַמִּזְבֵּ֗חַ רֵ֧יחַ נִיחֹ֛חַ אַזְכָּרָתָ֖הּ לַיהוָֽה׃

Man hebe eine Handvoll ab vom Kernmehl des Speiseopfers und von dessen Öl samt allem Weihrauch, der auf dem Speiseopfer, und lasse in Dampf aufgehen auf dem Altar zum Wohlgeruch, den Duftteil davon dem Herrn.

Rashi on Leviticus

והרים ממנו‎ AND HE SHALL TAKE UP FROM IT [IN HIS GRASP] — From it — from it as a united mass) — that there should be a full tenth part of an ephah at the same time in the vessel when he takes the fistful (Sifra, Tzav, Section 2 5; Menachot 24a).
Einen Rabbi fragenBookmarkShareCopy

Siftei Chakhamim

That he should not take [the fistful] by measure. Meaning: He should not make a utensil that holds a fistful and use it to measure. Rashi’s proof is because it is written בקמצו and it is not written מלא קמצו (the full fistful) [as in 2:2 above].
Einen Rabbi fragenBookmarkShareCopy

Chizkuni

והרים ממנו, “he will remove some of it,” (the gift offering) it has been written in the masculine mode (although the word מנחה is feminine) We find a similar grammatically incorrect construction in Leviticus 27,9: כל אשר יתן ממנו לה' יהיה קודש, where according to the grammar the Torah could have been expected to write ממנה instead of ממנו. There are numerous such incongruous constructions in different parts of the Torah.
Einen Rabbi fragenBookmarkShareCopy